CIO Applications Europe
About UsConferencePartner With Us
Close
  • Applications
      • Business Intelligence & Analytics
      • Call Center Solutions
      • CRM & Customer Experience
      • Data Center
      • Digital Transformation
      • E-Invoicing
      • Intelligent ERP & Automation
      • Risk Management & Compliance
      • Unified Communications (UCaaS)
  • Industries
      • Automotive & Mobility
      • Construction & Infrastructure
      • Financial Services
      • Healthcare
      • Retail & E-commerce
      • Telecom & Media
      • Travel and Hospitality Tech
  • Technologies
      • Cloud
      • Cybersecurity & Resilience
      • Data Engineering & Analytics
      • Generative and Agentic AI
      • IoT & Edge Computing
      • Robotics
  • Platforms
      • AWS
      • IBM
      • Microsoft
      • Salesforce
      • SAP
      • ServiceNow
  • Leadership Perspectives
  • Innovation Insights
  • Research
  • News
  • CXO Awards
    • Europe
      • US
  • Topics

  • Menu
      • Business Intelligence & Analytics
      • Cloud
      • Digital Transformation
      • Generative and Agentic AI
      • Microsoft
      • Risk Management & Compliance
      • Travel and Hospitality Tech
      • Unified Communications (UCaaS)
  • Microsoft
  • Risk Management & Compliance
  • Travel and Hospitality Tech
  • Generative and Agentic AI
  • Digital Transformation
  • Business Intelligence & Analytics
  • Cloud
Topics
  • Topics

  • Business Intelligence & Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Digital Transformation
  • Generative and Agentic AI
  • Microsoft
  • Risk Management & Compliance
  • Travel and Hospitality Tech
  • Unified Communications (UCaaS)
  • Home
  • Cognitive

A featured contribution from Leadership Perspectives: a curated forum reserved for leaders nominated by our subscribers and vetted by the Construction Tech Review Advisory Board.

Telefonica

Dr. Richard Benjamins, Chief AI & Data Strategist

The Myth of Cognitive

The media hype around Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Cognitive Computing is unquestionable at the moment. They seem to appear everywhere on the Internet in the press, blogs, conferences and events and many companies and startups are now moving towards offering AI or Cognitive solutions.

To start off, what do Intelligence and Cognition mean if we search for a definition online?

• Intelligence: “(1) the ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations: reason; also: the skilled use of reason, (2) the ability to apply knowledge to manipulate one’s environment or to think abstractly as measured by objective criteria (as tests).”

• Cognition: “the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses.”

The term Cognitive Computing has been popularized by IBM, through its Watson program that was able to win the Jeopardy game winning from the two best human players. Cognition is usually associated to language understanding and Jeopardy was all about that. But what are exactly the differences between Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Computing? And how are they related? Or are they synonyms? The best way we have seen this explained is by the late Herb Simon, one of the gurus of cognitive science:

“AI can have two purposes. One is to use the power of computers to augment human thinking, just as we use motors to augment human or horse power. Robotics and expert systems are major branches of that. The other is to use a computer’s artificial intelligence to understand how humans think. In a humanoid way. If you test your programs not merely by what they can accomplish, but how they accomplish it, then you’re really doing cognitive science; you’re using AI to understand the human mind.”

Stated in other words: AI is about making computers solve complex problems, that if people solved them would require intelligence – it is the result that counts. Cognitive Science is about making computers solve complex problems similar to how humans solve problems – it is the process that counts. So Cognitive Computing aims to mimic human reasoning behavior.

Deep Blue is a great example to look at. In 1997, for the first time in history this IBM computer program beat the world chess champion, Gary Kasparov. The main reason why Deep Blue was able to win was pure brute force. It was capable of evaluating 200 million chess positions per second, and to look up to 20 moves ahead, something no human is able to do.

So, is Deep Blue AI? Yes, because it solves a complex task, even better than the best human. Is Deep Blue Cognitive Computing? No, because the reasoning process has little to do with how humans play chess.

Today the terms AI and Cognitive Computing are largely used as synonyms. Even IBM states that explicitly in one of their reports: “Cognitive computing is quickly emerging as a transformative technology that enables organizations to gain business advantage. Also referred to as artificial intelligence (AI), cognitive technology augments human expertise to unlock new intelligence from vast quantities of data and to develop deep, predictive insights at scale.”

But while many may use the terms as synonyms, in a business context, Cognitive is mostly associated with natural language understanding, and this with automating call centers, digital assistants and chatbots.

Whether a company calls its digital assistant AI or Cognitive Computing is therefore a marketing decision. Everybody is offering AI solutions right now, and it becomes increasingly difficult to be perceived as differential. Cognitive Computing is an attractive alternative, as it alludes to the same underlying mystery (human intelligence), but the space is much less crowded.

The articles from these contributors are based on their personal expertise and viewpoints, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of their employers or affiliated organizations.
The Leadership Perspectives forum brings together voices shaping construction technology and innovation. Participation is by invitation only. It features leaders who are not merely observing technological change, but actively contributing to it through digital transformation and execution-driven insights.
EDITOR'S CHOICE
  • Willis Towers Watson

    Legal & General

    Building Technology Foundations That Last

    Mark Hall, Group Chief Technology Officer

  • Willis Towers Watson

    Adp Uk

    "Shift left" Defect Discovery using Agile and DevOps

    Keith Watson, Director Of Devops

  • Willis Towers Watson

    Motor Oil

    Trust, Security Strategy and the AI-Driven Threat Landscape

    Syngelakis J. Christos, Group Data Protection Officer

  • Willis Towers Watson

    Swiss Re [SWX: SREN]

    A Future of Enhanced Human Work

    Sergio Chelli, IT Procurement Manager at Swiss Re [SWX: SREN]

Weekly Brief

loading

I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info

×
#

CIO Applications Europe Weekly Brief

Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from CIO Applications Europe

Subscribe

loading

THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING

CIO Applications Europe
Follow on LinkedIn

About

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Partner With Us

Stay Connected

  • Subscribe
  • Newsletter
  • Sitemap

Contact Us

  • editor@cioapplicationseurope.com
  • sales@cioapplicationseurope.com
  • marketing@cioapplicationseurope.com

Legal

  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2026 CIO Applications Europe. All rights reserved. Headquarteblue in Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.

This content is copyright protected

However, if you would like to share the information in this article, you may use the link below:

https://cognitive.cioapplicationseurope.com/leadership-perspective/the-myth-of-cognitive-nid-1945.html